(h/t LutherPunk and Anastasia (Can’t wait to see her songs-about-death list (or LP’s for that matter…)))
- Nobody’s Fault but Mine (Zeppelin)
- Tourniquet (Evanescence)
- The fiery spirit (Anonymous 4 [Hildegard])
- Lullaby (Leæther Strip’s cover of The Cure)
- Out of This World [Oakenfold remix] (The Cure)
- 1000 BPM (Beck)
- The Song Remains the Same (Zeppelin)
- Missa Brevis-Credo (Palestrina)
- We’re in This Together (Goth Acoustic Ensemble covering NIN)
- Rock and Roll (Zeppelin)
- Passover (Joy Division)
- Jimmy Hickey’s Waltz (The Waterboys)
This article just came down the wire on the teaching of preaching in Episcopal seminaries.
There’s quite a lot I want to say about this—but don’t have the time at the moment. I’ll just let out a few bullet points for now:
- First, there is a shortage of trained faculty. No kidding… These days there are basically two kinds of preaching profs I’ve seen around and the situation relates directly to how PhD departments of religion are structured. You either have 1) biblical scholars who did preaching as an outside area (like yours truly…) or 2) people who fall into the “religious practices” category which includes things like missions, Christian Ed, etc. The second group doesn’t fall within the classical German way of seeing things and is often considered “lesser.” The key difference between these groups is formation–how they have been trained as scholars. And that includes languages.
- The biggest problem that I have encountered in my years of being a seminary student, TAing seminary students, and teaching them is that many have difficulty constructing clear English prose. Good writing skills are not necessarily a prerequisite to good speaking and preaching skills–but they sure don’t hurt. As I keep reminding my students, St. Augustine continually emphasized the importance of clarity. He reminds us that eloquence is wonderful and helpful–but not at the expense of clarity!
- Large amounts of constructive feedback is an essential part of the teaching process.
- Hethcock says that those who believe a good preacher from the neighborhood can be brought in as an adjunct professor are mistaken. He’s absolutely right. One of the problems that this band-aid fix perpetuates is that a good preacher is not always a good teacher of preaching. Some people are simply born with a talent for fitting words in memorable and meaningful ways. I’m skeptical whether a natural-born preacher can teach others to do what they do the way they do it–but that’s often what we see happening. Rather, all preachers can acquire habits and skills based on the formal and informal rules of rhetoric that enable them to become better preachers. That’s what needs to happen–not an attempted transfer of eloquence. (I’m not saying that naturally gifted preachers can’t teach preaching–I’m just saying that the attempt to teach their own personal style fails more often than not.)