- Prayer Book Revision was passed by the House of Deputies.
- As of this writing, it has not been passed by the House of Bishops which is required for it to become actual passed legislation. [Update 7/9/2018, 12:53 PM EST—The bishops are at work on it; according to the version in the virtual binder, they have taken off the table any changes to Rite I, the Historical Documents, and the Lord’s Prayer.]
- If Because the bishops
makemade changes to the resolution and then passed it, it will have to be re-debated and re-passed without amendment in the House of Deputies. Because if they do amend it, it will then have to be re-passed in the House of Bishops… And if any approval in either place does not occur before convention ends, the thing as a whole is dead.
- The Project, Budget, & Finance committee has not yet released a budget. What work gets done depends on what funding is given and with which strings.
Ok—say it passes. What next?
- The resolution as currently written directs the SCLM to follow the plan proposed in the Blue Book. which includes both qualitative and quantitative listening. This is where my “big data” Bulletin Collection Project is laid out.
- Does this mean that the Bulletin Collection Project will happen? It’s likely—it depends on the funding and the degree to which the funding is designated. If it has a line-item or is directed towards the Episcopal Archives (who would be the ones directing it), it will almost certainly happen. If the money is given in a big bucket to the SCLM to decide how they want to parcel it out, then it will depend entirely on the next iteration of the SCLM and to what degree they follow the directions given to them.
- (If you don’t know what I mean by “Bulletin Collection Project,” the Blue Book has a garbled form of it, but the big picture for it is laid out in this post written after last GC which lists the two other things that I still think we need 1) big-data bulletin collection, 2) transparent input from the church, and 3) transparent drafting mechanisms.)
- What “next iteration of the SCLM”? Remember that appointment for clergy and laity to the SCLM is only for two triennia; bishops serve only one. Each triennium, half of the membership turns over for the clergy and laity—and all the bishops do. Thus, several of my friends and colleagues will be rolling off and we do not know who will be put on it. And you can bet that if you thought trying to get on the SCLM was difficult and contentious before, it will only be moreso now with revision in the air!
- (I’ve seen a few comments online wishing I hadn’t resigned. It wouldn’t have made a bit of difference, because my term would have been up now anyway and I accomplished what I could do while I was there.)
That’s enough for now—time to get some actual work done…
I have been thoroughly enjoying your posts. As you know the Episcopal Church has ‘lesser’ prayer books. I am speaking here specifically of the prayer book for the Armed Forces. This has the potential to be very rich but has been neglected for decades. Any thoughts on that
Beth, my first thought is that the authority to create a new Prayer Book for the Armed Forces should be delegated to the Office of the Bishop for Armed Forces and Federal Ministries. My second thought is that it would be nice if our federal ministries office could cooperate with the equivalent offices in the ELCA and UMC, and possibly also PCUSA, UCC, and RCA to create an ecuminical prayer book that all mainline Protestant soldiers, sailors, and airpeople could use.