Positive Points from a Purple Shirt

Given the behavior of bishops the last few (yeah, ok, 18 hundred or so) years*, it’s always refreshing to see a bishop make some clear, cogent, and thoroughly Christian points. And these are the Canadian Diocese of New Westminster which—as I understand it—is one of the more divided dioceses theologically in the Anglican Church of Canada.

I’ll only editorialize one little bit and that’s to cite James: “But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves” (Jam 1:22). It’s important to think these things—but it’s not enough to congratulate yourself for saying you think them; they must be ennacted as well. And that goes as much for the bishop who spoke them as for the rest of us.


Pray for the unity of Christians, for a spirit of charity towards those with whom we may disagree, and for God’s forgiveness of our mutual failure to honour the prayer of Christ in St. John’s Gospel “that they may be one.”


Give particular support to those conservative and traditional Christians who remain with their church and grieve the departure of friends.


Teach our members about the genius of Anglicanism and its balance of Scripture, reason and tradition within the boundaries of common prayer.


Emphasize in our preaching and leadership the centrality of mission and its priority over ecclesiastical politics.


Challenge the false stereotypes that foster polarization – e.g. the ‘heartless conservative’ or the ‘unbiblical liberal.’


Give thanks that our church, for all its messiness, is honestly and openly facing issues some other bodies cannot.


Press forward in ministry and evangelism at the local level.


Deepen our study and immersion in Scripture. Place ourselves under the authority of the Christ it reveals. Avoid both an empty relativism and a harsh literalism.


Encourage both local media and the non-churchgoing public to understand the deeper roots of this development.


Take the ‘long view’ – i.e. remember the consistent triumph of the Gospel over the historic fragmentation of the church, and the persistence of faith through the failures of human discipleship.

Please remember our diocesan and national leaders in your prayers too. And above all, let’s get on with the normal work of being the church.

A big thank you to Lisa from My Manner of Life who posted it and a h/t to the Postulant for linking to it.

* Yes, I believe in bishops. As an Apostolic Succession believer I believe they’re necessary for the fullness of the Church. But I also believe they’re completely human and have ably demonstrated over the centuries their fallibility…

7 thoughts on “Positive Points from a Purple Shirt

  1. Caelius Spinator

    New Westminster, not New Winchester. Bishop Ingham is in part responsible for the other casus Windsoris Rescripti.

  2. Derek the Ænglican

    Heh–quite right, Caelius. I guess I just have an instinctive preference for Winchester over Westminster… ;-)

    And yes–I did find this rather interesting given +Ingham place in the whole situation. If his money is where his mouth is, though, he may be trying to model the reverse of what the Fogey likes to refer to as “tolerant conservatism” and thus “tolerant liberalism”.

  3. Malcolm French+

    See also the pastoral letter of the Bishop of Edmonton.

    It should be noted that, despite the way Michael of New West has been demonized by the “conservatives,” he was very “conservative” himself in that he denied consent to motions of his diocesan synod on this issue, only granting it the third time it was passed.

  4. Christopher

    Emphasize in our preaching and leadership the centrality of mission and its priority over ecclesiastical politics.

    Not so easy to do in real life. The reality is ecclesiastical politics heavily impact the possibility of doing mission.

  5. Derek the Ænglican

    I’ve been favorably impressed by much of what I’ve heard of the outgoing Bishop of Edmonton. I was hoping she’d get the nod for Canadian Primate…

    There are at least two kinds of people who hold fast to the rules (as she and others do); one holds to the rules for the sake of maintaining the status quo. The other holds to the rules because they are the community consensus and—while following them—take an active role in shaping the consensus in accords with the Gospel whether it’s status quo or not… I like to think that M and I (and her Grace) fall into the second rather than the first.

Comments are closed.